Sources of Law Under Article 2
🟢 Lite — Quick Review (1h–1d)
Rapid summary for last-minute revision before your exam.
Topic 7 introduces the building blocks of Kenyan jurisprudence: what law is, where Kenyan courts draw it from, and how the courts themselves are stacked. The single most-tested idea is the closed list of sources of law in Article 2 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010.
- Article 2 sources: Constitution, Acts of Parliament, common law, doctrines of equity, African customary law, Islamic law, and English statutes of general application in force before 12 August 1897.
- Court hierarchy peak: Supreme Court sits at the top, with decisions binding every lower court.
- Public vs private law: public regulates the state and citizens (constitutional, criminal, administrative); private regulates person-to-person relations (contract, tort, property, family).
🟡 Standard — Regular Study (2d–2mo)
Standard content for students with a few days to months.
Definition and Nature of Law
Law is a body of rules imposed and enforced by the state to regulate human conduct, settle disputes, and maintain order. Kenyan jurisprudence treats law as positive (made and enforced by human authority) rather than purely moral or natural. Two functional splits run through the syllabus: substantive law (creates rights and duties, e.g. the Law of Contract Act) versus procedural or adjective law (prescribes how those rights are enforced, e.g. the Civil Procedure Act); and municipal law (binding within Kenya) versus international law (treaties and customary international rules, which Article 2(6) requires the state to respect).
Sources of Law Under Article 2
Article 2 of the Constitution exhaustively lists the recognised sources. Any rule outside this list has no automatic legal force in Kenya. The Constitution itself is the supreme source under Article 2(1)–(2): any law inconsistent with it is void to the extent of that inconsistency.
| Source | Origin / Scope |
|---|---|
| Constitution of Kenya 2010 | Supreme law; prevails over every other source |
| Acts of Parliament | Statutes enacted by the National Assembly and Senate |
| Common law | Judicially developed principles inherited from England |
| Doctrines of equity | English equitable remedies adapted to Kenya |
| African customary law | Applies only where not repugnant to justice/morality or inconsistent with any written law |
| Islamic law | Applied by Kadhis’ Courts to Muslim personal-status matters |
| English statutes of general application | Only those in force in Kenya on 12 August 1897 |
Classification and Court Hierarchy
Kenyan law divides into public law (constitutional, criminal, administrative) and private law (contract, tort, property, family, succession). Courts are stacked vertically, and lower courts are bound by decisions of higher courts through the doctrine of binding precedent.
| Tier | Court | Jurisdiction Highlight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supreme Court | Highest court; binds all others; exclusive original jurisdiction on presidential election petitions |
| 2 | Court of Appeal | Appeals from High Court and comparable courts |
| 3 | High Court, Environment & Land Court, Employment & Labour Court | Unlimited civil and criminal jurisdiction; constitutional enforcement |
| 4 | Magistrates’ Courts | Limited civil (statutory monetary cap) and summary criminal jurisdiction |
| 5 | Kadhis’ Courts | Muslim personal status (marriage, divorce, inheritance) where parties consent |
| 6 | Tribunals, Courts Martial | Special statutory and disciplinary matters |
Common Traps to Avoid
- Confusing any English statute with the law of Kenya; only pre-12 August 1897 statutes of general application survived reception.
- Assuming African customary law applies automatically — it must first be pleaded and proved as a fact, and may be excluded for repugnancy.
- Forgetting that Kadhis’ Courts cannot hear criminal or commercial disputes, only personal-status matters.
🔴 Extended — Deep Study (3mo+)
Comprehensive coverage for students on a longer study timeline.
Mechanism: Why Article 2 Functions as a Closed List
Article 2(4) was a deliberate break from the old received English-law regime of the 1897 India-style reception clause. By enumerating sources and capping English statutes at the 1897 cutoff, the framers ensured future statute law could only enter Kenya through Parliament, not through English Acts. This forces lawyers to argue that any post-1897 English doctrine either forms part of the common law (which can evolve judicially) or has been specifically enacted locally. Candidates should expect MCQs that test whether, for example, the Misrepresentation Act 1967 (English) applies in Kenya — it does not automatically, because it post-dates 1897 and Parliament never adopted it.
Devolution, Judicial Independence, and the JSC
The 2010 Constitution layered two further doctrines on top of Article 2:
- Separation of powers between Parliament (legislative), the Executive (Cabinet), and the Judiciary — each defined in Chapter Eight.
- Devolution under Chapter Eleven, which created 47 county governments with their own legislative and executive authority, expanding the number of potential law-making bodies whose Acts now rank as a recognised source.
The Judicial Service Commission (Article 172) recommends judges and enforces judicial independence so courts can strike down unconstitutional Acts without political pressure.
Worked Example: Identifying the Source
Question (style): A litigant argues that the English Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 forms part of Kenyan law by reception. Is this correct?
Reasoning: The Act was enacted in 1999, well after the 12 August 1897 cutoff in Article 2(5). It therefore cannot enter Kenyan law as a received English statute. It would only apply if Parliament enacted equivalent legislation or if Kenyan common law independently developed the principle. The litigant’s argument fails.
Practice Prompts
- List the seven sources of law in the order they appear in Article 2 and identify which one conditions its application on the repugnancy test.
- A magistrate convicts an accused under a county by-law challenged as inconsistent with the Constitution. Which Article 2 provision governs the outcome, and which court finally determines the question?
Continue your study
- View this topic in your Kenya Law Aptitude roadmap — see where “Topic 7” fits in your personalised plan
- Build a quick revision plan — 1-day sprint covering highest-weight topics
- Kenya Law Aptitude exam overview — pattern, eligibility, and syllabus
- All General Knowledge notes — browse sibling topics in this subject
Content adapted based on your selected roadmap duration. Switch tiers using the selector above.
Sources & verification
- Official Kenya Law Aptitude syllabus & pattern: https://ksl.ac.ke
- Editorial methodology: research → draft → fact-verify → curate pipeline
- Reviewed by Pushkar Saini · last updated
- Found an error? Email [email protected] with the page URL and a one-line description — corrections typically actioned within 48 hours.