Constitutional Development
🟢 Lite — Quick Review (1h–1d)
Rapid summary for last-minute revision.
Constitutional Development — Key Facts for KPSC KAS • Government of India Act 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms): First constitutional development; dyarchy in provinces — transferred subjects (law, health, education) to elected Indian ministers; reserved subjects (police, revenue, irrigation) remained with Governor; Simon Commission (1927) — all-white commission; boycott by INC. • Government of India Act 1935: Largest Act; federal structure; provincial dyarchy (all subjects except reserved ones now with elected governments); All-India Federation (never implemented); dyarchy at center (Secretary of State controlled). • Indian Independence Act 1947: Ended British rule; created two dominions — India and Pakistan; Mountbatten as Viceroy; August 15, 1947 as date; partition provisions; Bengal and Punjab partition. • Constitution of India (1950): Became republic on January 26, 1950 (26 January chosen as Republic Day — anniversary of Purna Swaraj declaration of 1930); single constitution; parliamentary system; DPSP added. • Landmark Amendments: 1st Amendment (1951) — validated land reforms, added 9th Schedule; 42nd Amendment (1976) — added Socialist, Secular, Integrity; 44th Amendment (1978) — diluted 42nd Amendment, added articles 21A, 24A.
⚡ Exam tip: KPSC KAS frequently asks about dyarchy, Simon Commission, 1935 Act features, and constitutional amendments. Questions on evolution of federalism through amendments, Basic Structure Doctrine, and Article 356 limits are common.
🟡 Standard — Regular Study (2d–2mo)
Standard content.
Constitutional Development — KPSC KAS Study Guide
Evolution of Constitutional Governance
Government of India Act 1919 — Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms
Background:
- Montagu-Chelmsford Report (1918): Edwin Montagu (Secretary of State) and Lord Chelmsford (Viceroy) proposed reforms
- Purpose: Satisfy Indian political aspirations while maintaining British control
- November 1919: Act received Royal Assent
Key Features:
Dyarchy in Provinces:
- Transferred subjects: Law, health, education, agriculture, local self-government — given to elected Indian ministers (controlled by elected legislature)
- Reserved subjects: Police, justice, revenue, irrigation, press — kept with Governor (British)
- Governor could act in his discretion on reserved subjects
Other Provisions:
- Bicameral legislature at center: Imperial Legislative Council (lower) and Council of State (upper)
- ** Provincial legislative councils**: Expanded — 70% elected (from 30% previously)
- Women’s suffrage: Not granted; property qualifications remained
- Public Services Commission: Established for recruitment
Simon Commission (1927):
- All-white British commission to review 1919 Act; name after Sir John Simon
- Boycott: INC, Muslim League, Hindu Mahasabha all opposed; no Indian members
- Lahore Session 1927: INC resolved for complete independence; Nehru Report (1928) —demand for dominion status within year or complete independence
Criticism of 1919 Act:
- Dyarchy created divided administration; no real transfer of power
- Franchise very limited (property qualification); minorities not satisfied
Government of India Act 1935
Negotiations and Drafting:
- White Paper on Constitutional Reform (1933): Basis for negotiations; published by British government
- Joint Select Committee: Reviewed the white paper; Act drafted
- Act received Royal Assent: August 1935
Key Features:
Federal Structure:
- All-India Federation: Units — Governors’ Provinces (10), Princely States (562), Chief Commissioner’s Provinces (5); Never implemented due to princely states’ non-participation
- Division of powers: Federal List, Provincial List, Concurrent List; Federal subjects: defense, external affairs, currency; Provincial subjects: law, police; Concurrent: marriage, contract
Provincial Autonomy:
- Full responsible government in provinces — dyarchy abolished except for Governor’s reserved powers
- Governor had special responsibility for: civil disobedience, Scheduled Castes, irrigation
- Bicameral legislature: Provincial Legislative Assembly (lower), Council of State (upper) in some provinces
Weaknesses:
- Section 87: Governor-General could override federal legislature on any matter in his discretion
- Section 126: Could send messages to legislature; force attendance
- Dyarchy at Center: Secretary of State for India (British) controlled India policy; required British in certain posts
- Princely states: No elected representation; rulers appointed governors
Significance:
- Provided the administrative and federal structure that the 1950 Constitution largely adopted
- Provided limited responsible government — significant step toward self-government
- Never fully implemented: Federal part never came into effect; outbreak of World War II intervened
Indian Independence Act 1947
Background:
- Cabinet Mission Plan (1946): Proposed loose federation with grouping; rejected by Congress
- Mountbatten Plan (June 1947): Lord Mountbatten as Viceroy; accelerated British departure; Congress and League accepted partition
- Act passed by British Parliament: July 1947; received Royal Assent July 18, 1947
Key Features:
- Two New Dominions: India and Pakistan (August 15, 1947)
- Boundary Commission: Sir Cyril Radcliffe — drew partition lines in Punjab and Bengal
- Princely States: 562 states asked to join either dominion; accession instruments signed
- Executive authority: Governor-General (representative of British monarch) in each dominion
- Legislatures: Existing legislative assemblies continued; some remained until new constitutions
- Severance of British suzerainty: Complete break from British Crown; British monarch no longer head of state
Mountbatten as Governor-General:
- Lord Louis Mountbatten became India’s first Governor-General (also Viceroy until independence)
- Stayed until June 1948; replaced by Chakravarthi Rajagopalachari (C Rajagopalachari)
Constitutional Evolution Post-1950
Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order (1950):
- Article 370: Special status for J&K; Union government’s powers limited to defense, foreign affairs, communication; other subjects required J&K consent
- Abrogated by Presidential Order (August 2019) under 370th Amendment (5th Schedule via Presidential order, bypassing J&K Constituent Assembly)
Key Amendments:
- 1st Amendment (1951): Added 9th Schedule (protected from judicial review); expanded freedom of speech limitations; included land reforms
- 7th Amendment (1956): Created new states and union territories; reorganized states on linguistic basis (States Reorganisation Act 1956 — combined with this amendment)
- 42nd Amendment (1976): Added Socialist, Secular, Integrity to Preamble; added 10th Schedule (anti-defection); made DPSP more justiciable (later reversed)
- 44th Amendment (1978): Restored 42nd Amendment dilution; added Article 21A (right to education), 24A (right to work); changed 42nd Amendment provisions
Constitutional Development and Karnataka:
- States Reorganization Act (1956): Created Mysore state (from Mysore + Kannada-speaking districts of Bombay Presidency and Madras Presidency); Karnataka as linguistic state
- Mysore State (after 1973): Renamed Karnataka after 1973; unified Kannada-speaking regions
🔴 Extended — Deep Study (3mo+)
Comprehensive coverage.
Constitutional Development — Comprehensive KPSC KAS Notes
Federalism and Center-State Relations
Evolution of Federal Features
Indian Federalism — A Unique Model: India is a quasi-federal (federation with strong unitary bias) rather than a pure federation like the United States. This reflects:
- British legacy of unitary governance
- Requirements of national unity and integration
- Historical necessity of keeping diverse nation together
Key Constitutional Provisions:
Division of Powers:
- Union List: 100 items; defense, external affairs, railways, posts, atomic energy, foreign trade
- State List: 61 items; police, public order, agriculture, forests, local government, public health
- Concurrent List: 52 items; criminal law, marriage, contract, education, forests, environmental protection
- Residual Powers: After 42nd Amendment, residual powers with Parliament
Financial Federalism:
- Article 280 — Finance Commission: Award determines distribution of Union’s tax revenues to states
- National Finance Commission (NFC): 7th NFC Award (2009); 9th NFC Award (2010) — based on population and revenue
- CFC (Central Finance Commission): Additional central transfers
Fiscal Federalism:
- Article 275 — Statutory Grants: Parliament may make grants to states requiring funds
- Central Taxes: GST (Goods and Services Tax — 2017 Constitution Amendment) replaced many cascading indirect taxes; uniform market
GST Implementation:
- 101st Amendment (2016): Inserted Article 246A — Concurrent power over GST
- GST Council (Article 279A): 250th meeting now; recommends tax rates; all states represented; requires 3/4th majority (75%) to pass; represents cooperative federalism
- GST Tax rates: 5%, 12%, 18%, 28% four slab structure; luxury goods, sin goods at 28%
Central-State Tensions
President’s Rule (Article 356):
- Governor’s Report: Governor reports state machinery failure; President can issue Proclamation assuming state powers
- Limitations (Bommai case — 1994):
- Cannot dismiss elected governments for policy differences
- Courts can review President’s satisfaction
- Repeated dismissals erode federalism
- Must be ratified by Parliament within 2 months
Examples of Article 356 misuse:
- 1951: PEPSU (East Punjab) — first use
- 1975 (Emergency): Many opposition-run states dismissed
- 1990: J&K (Farooq Abdullah dismissed; Governor’s rule)
- 2019: Maharashtra (President’s rule after no party formed government after elections)
Article 356 — Supreme Court Standards:
- SR Bommai: Not a federal court; but a constitutional court; established guidelines for Article 356 use
- State Legislature must be given opportunity to prove majority
- Political differences not grounds for President’s Rule
- Governor cannot use personal assessment to dismiss elected government
Sarkaria Commission and Subsequent Recommendations
Sarkaria Commission (1983-1988):
- Commission to review center-state relations; Justice R. Sarkaria (former judge)
- Key recommendations:
- More states in planning commission
- Use of Article 356 should be “extreme step”
- Inter-state water disputes should be resolved faster Mostly unimplemented — center remained powerful
Punchhi Commission (2007-2010):
- Commission on Centre-State Relations under Justice (retired) Madan Mohan Punchhi
- Recommendations:
- Article 263: Inter-state Council should be activated more
- Article 356: Should require parliamentary approval within 30 days; governor’s role should be reduced
- Article 356: Should only be invoked in genuine breakdown of law and order
- Land boundary agreements: Commission recommended resolving boundary disputes with states
- Governor appointments: Should reflect federalism principles
Land Revenue and Property Rights
Land Revenue Systems:
- Zamindari System (Permanent Settlement): Bengal, Bihar, Orissa — Zamindars became landowners; 10/11th of revenue to government; created class of absentee landlords; ryots (farmers) became tenants
- Ryotwari System: Madras Presidency, parts of Bombay — direct state-to-cultivator relationship; no Zamindars
- Mahalwari System: Punjab, UP — village/community level revenue assessment
Land Reforms:
- Abolition of Zamindari: 1st Amendment (1951) protected Zamindari abolition laws in 9th Schedule; 4th Amendment (1955) further protected; aimed at removing intermediaries
- Ceiling on Landholdings: State laws fixing maximum land a family could hold; excess land to be distributed to landless
- Results: Zamindari largely abolished; ceiling laws had limited impact due to exemptions and litigation
Forest Rights Act (2006):
- Recognizes rights of forest-dwelling communities over forest land
- Forest Rights: Land rights, forest produce rights, grazing rights
- ** Gram Sabhas** can protect forests
- Criticism: Some conservationists argue this leads to deforestation; Forest department opposition
Examination Strategy
KPSC KAS commonly asks:
- Analyse the evolution of federalism in India from 1919 to present
- Compare the 1919 Act and 1935 Act’s federal features
- Explain Article 356 and its limitations with landmark cases
- Discuss GST implementation and its impact on federalism
- Evaluate the role of Finance Commission in centre-state relations
Key distinctions:
- Dyarchy (1919) vs Provincial Autonomy (1935 Act) vs Full State Autonomy (1950 Constitution)
- Article 356 (President’s Rule) vs Article 365 (President’s satisfaction) vs Article 256 (obligation of states)
- Union List vs State List vs Concurrent List — and which level has supremacy in conflicts
- Finance Commission vs Planning Commission (now NITI Aayog) vs GST Council — different federal bodies
Content adapted based on your selected roadmap duration. Switch tiers using the selector above.