Skip to main content
Business Laws 3% exam weight

Indian Contract Act — Offer, Acceptance, and Consideration

Part of the CMA Foundation study roadmap. Business Laws topic busine-006 of Business Laws.

Indian Contract Act, 1872 — Part 1

Introduction to the Indian Contract Act, 1872

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is the primary legislation governing contracts in India. It defines what constitutes a valid contract, the rules for formation, and the rights and obligations of parties. It applies to the whole of India except the state of Jammu & Kashmir.

Definition of Contract (Section 2(h))

A Contract is an agreement enforceable by law. To be enforceable, a contract must possess all the essential elements of a valid contract.

Definition of Agreement (Section 2(e))

An Agreement is the mutual promises/understanding between two or more parties. Essentially, agreement = offer + acceptance.

Formula: Contract = Agreement + Enforceability by Law (i.e., certain agreements that are legally binding)

Essential Elements of a Valid Contract

  1. Offer and Acceptance (Sections 3–9): There must be a valid offer and a valid acceptance
  2. Consensus ad idem: Both parties must agree on the same thing in the same sense (mutual intention)
  3. Consideration (Section 25): Something of value must be exchanged
  4. Capacity of Parties (Sections 10–12): Parties must be competent to contract
  5. Free Consent (Sections 13–22): Consent must not be obtained by coercion, undue influence, fraud, or misrepresentation
  6. Legality of Object (Sections 23–30): The agreement must be for a lawful purpose
  7. Possibility of Performance (Section 56): The agreement must be capable of being performed
  8. Certainty (Section 29): The terms must be certain and not vague

Offer and Acceptance

What is an Offer? (Section 2(a))

An offer is a proposal made by the offeror to the offeree. It is the expression of willingness to do or abstain from doing something, with the intent that it shall become binding upon acceptance.

Key case: Hyde v. Wrench (1840) — An offer can be revoked before acceptance. A purported acceptance of a revoked offer is a new offer.

Communication of Offer (Section 3)

An offer is complete when:

  • It is communicated to the offeree
  • The offeree has knowledge of the offer

Example: Posting a letter — communication of offer is complete when the letter reaches the offeree (Section 3).

Types of Offers

TypeDescriptionExample
Express offerStated in clear words (oral or written)“I offer to sell my car for ₹5 lakhs”
Implied offerInferred from conductDisplay of goods in a shop with price tag
Specific offerMade to a specific personOffer to sell a specific piece of land to a named individual
General offerMade to the world at largeA reward for finding lost dog — anyone who fulfills the conditions can claim
Cross offerTwo parties make identical offers to each other simultaneouslyNot acceptance — does not constitute a contract
Counter offerAcceptance with modification”I accept but only if the price is ₹4 lakhs” — counter offer, original offer lapses

Acceptance (Section 2(b))

Acceptance is the expression of assent to the offer. The offeree must communicate acceptance to the offeror.

Rules of Acceptance:

  1. Must be communicated (silence is not acceptance — Felthouse v. Brindley, 1862)
  2. Must be absolute and unconditional (conditional acceptance = counter offer = rejection)
  3. Must be in the mode prescribed by the offeror (if no mode prescribed — any reasonable mode)
  4. Must be within the time limit specified or within a reasonable time
  5. Cannot be given before communication of offer (offer must exist to be accepted)

Communication of Acceptance (Section 4):

  • The acceptance is complete when:
    • The offeror receives it (if acceptance is communicated by post/instrument)
    • When put in the course of transmission (if acceptance is communicated by telephone/telegraph)
    • When received by the offeror (if acceptance is by telephone/telegraph)

Revocation of Offer and Acceptance (Sections 5–6)

Revocation of Offer (Section 6):

  • Offer can be revoked at any time before acceptance
  • Revocation must be communicated to the offeree before acceptance
  • Revocation by lapse: Offer lapses if not accepted within specified time or reasonable time
  • Revocation by rejection: If offeree rejects, the offer is terminated

Revocation of Acceptance (Section 5):

  • Acceptance can be revoked if revocation reaches the offeror before or at the same time as acceptance

Consideration (Section 25)

Definition: Consideration is something of value given by the promisee to the promisor (or at the promisor’s request) in exchange for the promise. It can be:

  • An act (doing something)
  • A forbearance (not doing something)
  • A promise to do or not do something

Section 25: “An agreement without consideration is void” — unless it satisfies one of the exceptions.

Rules of Consideration

  1. Something must be given: Consideration need not be adequate (courts don’t judge whether price is fair), but something must be given
  2. Must move from the promisee: Consideration must be given by the person to whom the promise is made (or someone on their behalf)
  3. Must be real and not illusory: Cannot be physically impossible or legally impossible
  4. Must not be past: Past consideration is not valid (but exceptions exist)
  5. Must be lawful: Consideration must not be illegal, immoral, or opposed to public policy

Exceptions to Consideration (Section 25)

ExceptionSectionDescription
Love and affection25(1)Promise to pay a debt barred by limitation — if made out of natural love and affection between near relatives
Promise to compensate25(2)Promise to compensate for something done voluntarily (past consideration treated as valid) — e.g., A saves B’s property from fire; B promises to pay; promise is enforceable
Promise to pay debt barred by limitation25(3)If debtor promises to pay a time-barred debt (due to limitation period expiry)

Stranger to Contract (Privity of Contract)

The doctrine of privity of contract states that only parties to a contract can enforce it or be bound by it. A third party (stranger) cannot sue or be sued under a contract.

Key case: Tweddle v. Atkinson (1861) — A third party cannot enforce a contract even if it was made for their benefit.

Exceptions to stranger to contract:

  • Trust/Charge: If a contract creates a trust, the beneficiary (third party) can enforce it
  • Family settlements: A third party can enforce if the agreement is based on a family arrangement
  • Acknowledgment: If the promisor acknowledges the third party’s rights

Capacity of Parties (Sections 10–12)

Who Can Contract? (Section 11)

Every person is competent to contract who:

  1. Is of the age of majority (18 years in India; 21 years for those under guardianship of Court of Wards)
  2. Is of sound mind
  3. Is not disqualified from contracting by any law

Minor (Person Below 18 Years)

Section 11: A minor is not competent to contract.

Key rules for minor’s agreements:

  1. Contract with a minor is void: Not voidable — absolutely void (unlike other defective contracts which are voidable)
  2. No restitution: Minor cannot be asked to return what they received — even if they misrepresent their age (Soni Jayaram v. Thodur, 1899)
  3. Benefit exception: A minor can be a promisee (beneficiary) — the other party must fulfill their part
  4. Partnership: A minor cannot become a partner — but can be admitted to benefits of partnership (under Partnership Act)

Key case: Mohiri Bibi v. Dharmod Ghose (1903) — Contract with minor is void; no restitution; money paid to minor need not be returned.

Unsound Mind (Section 12)

A person of unsound mind is not competent to contract. However:

  • A person who is usually of unsound mind but is in a lucid interval may contract during that period
  • A person who is drunk cannot contract until sober

Disqualified Persons

  • Persons declared insolvent by a court
  • Foreign sovereigns and ambassadors (with certain immunities)
  • Corporations (governed by their own Acts — Companies Act, etc.)

Effects of Incapacity (Section 19, 19A)

  • Agreements with minors: Void — no liability
  • Agreements with persons of unsound mind or disqualified persons: Voidable at the option of the other party (if the other party was unaware of the incapacity and the agreement is not for the benefit of the minor)

CTET Exam Focus

  • Contract = Agreement + Enforceability by law (Section 2(h))
  • Offer: Definition (Section 2(a)), communication, types (express, implied, general, specific)
  • Acceptance: Rules (absolute, communicated, in prescribed mode), communication of acceptance (Section 4)
  • Revocation: Offer lapses by rejection, lapse of time, counter-offer (not acceptance)
  • Consideration: Something of value; rules (must move from promisee, must be real, not past); Section 25 — agreement without consideration is void (3 exceptions)
  • Minor’s agreement: Void ab initio (void from beginning); Mohiri Bibi case — no restitution to minor even if minor misrepresented age
  • Privity of contract: Stranger cannot sue; exceptions (trust, family settlement)
  • Incapacity: Minor, unsound mind, disqualified persons

Content adapted based on your selected roadmap duration. Switch tiers using the selector above.