Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV — Articles 36-51)
🟢 Lite — Quick Review (1h–1d)
Rapid summary for last-minute revision before your exam.
Directive Principles of State Policy — Key Facts for BPSC
- Part IV of Constitution — Articles 36-51
- Inspired by Irish Constitution — borrowed from Irish Constitution (Article 45)
- Not enforceable in court (Article 37 — “shall be fundamental in governance”)
- 3 categories: Socialistic, Gandhian, Liberal Intellectual
- Part IV-A (Article 51A): Fundamental Duties — added by 42nd Amendment (1976)
- Conflict with FR: FR prevails (Minerva Mills case, 1980)
- Directive to state: Secure social order, raise living standards, distribute ownership
⚡ Exam tip: BPSC frequently asks: “Which is the source of DPSP?” (Answer: Irish Constitution). Also: “DPSP are not enforceable” — matches with Article 37.
🟡 Standard — Regular Study (2d–2mo)
Standard content for students with a few days to months.
Overview of Directive Principles
Article 36-37: Definition and Application
Article 36: Defines “State” for DPSP as same as Part III (Government, Legislature, local authorities, statutory bodies)
Article 37:
“The provisions contained in this Part shall not be enforceable by any court, but the principles laid down herein are fundamental in the governance of the country.”
Key understanding:
- DPSP are non-justiciable (cannot be enforced in court)
- But they are fundamental — Parliament must keep them in mind when making laws
- State must apply these in making laws
Classification of DPSP
Category 1: Socialistic Principles (Articles 38-39)
Article 38 — Social Order:
- State shall secure social order by promoting welfare of people
- Minimise inequalities in income, status, facilities
Article 39 — Principles of Policy:
- (a) All citizens shall have equal right to adequate means of livelihood
- (b) Distribution of material resources to serve common good
- (c) Prevention of concentration of wealth
- (d) Equal pay for equal work
- (e) Protection of workers’ strength (women, children)
- (f) Childhood and youth protected against exploitation
Important: Article 39(b) — “Property to be distributed to serve common good” — led to 4th and 17th Amendments (land reforms). Struck down in Kesavananda Bharati (1973) for violating basic structure? No — Court upheld but said Parliament cannot destroy basic structure.
Category 2: Gandhian Principles (Articles 40-48)
Article 40 — Village Panchayats:
- State shall establish Village Panchayats as units of self-government
- 73rd Amendment (1992): Made this a fundamental aspect — added Part IX
Article 41 — Right to Work, Education, Public Assistance:
- State shall provide work, education, public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness, undeserved want
Article 42 — Provision for just and humane conditions of work:
- Maternity relief (paid leave, creches)
Article 43 — Living wage for workers:
- State shall ensure decent standard of living, fair wage
- Note: Different from “minimum wage” — a living wage is higher
Article 43A — Workers’ Participation in Management:
- State shall take steps for workers’ participation in management
- Added by 44th Amendment (1978)
Article 44 — Uniform Civil Code:
- State shall endeavour to secure for citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout India
- Status: Not yet implemented — controversial
- Goa already has UCC (applicable to all except Sundays for Hindus, Muslims)
Article 45 — Provision for early childhood care and education:
- State shall provide free, compulsory education for all children below 6 years
- 86th Amendment (2002): Moved to Article 21A as Right to Education
Article 46 — Educational and economic interests of SC/ST:
- State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of SC/ST
- Protective discrimination: Scholarships, reserved institutions
Article 47 — Nutrition and standard of living:
- State shall raise level of nutrition and standard of living
- Public distribution system: PDS, ration shops
- Antyodaya: Anna Yojana (2000)
Article 48 — Agriculture and Animal Husbandry:
- State shall organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern, scientific lines
- Ban on cow slaughter (proposed but not enforced uniformly)
🔴 Extended — Deep Study (3mo+)
Comprehensive coverage for students on a longer study timeline.
DPSP vs Fundamental Rights — The Conflict
The Problem
FR (Part III) is justiciable — courts can enforce DPSP (Part IV) is non-justiciable — courts cannot enforce
But what if a law made to fulfill DPSP violates FR?
The Resolution
Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980) — Landmark Case:
- 55th Amendment (1974) added Art. 31C: “Laws implementing DPSP cannot be challenged on FR grounds”
- Challenge: Does this destroy basic structure?
- Supreme Court held:
- Article 31C is valid for implementing DPSP under Article 39(b) and (c)
- But: Basic Structure doctrine applies — Parliament cannot use this to destroy basic structure
- Article 368 (amending power) is itself subject to basic structure
The 42nd Amendment (1976) Controversy:
- Added Section 55 to Article 368 — gave Parliament unlimited power to amend any part
- Struck down in Kesavananda Bharati (1973) (before 42nd Amendment was passed)
- Minerva Mills (1980) confirmed: Basic structure cannot be destroyed even with DPSP
Rule: FR > DPSP. DPSP must be implemented without violating FR.
Important Cases on DPSP
| Case | Year | Key Holding |
|---|---|---|
| Champakam Dorairajan | 1951 | SC struck down Tamil Nadu’s communal G.O. — FR prevails over DPSP |
| Madhav Khosla | 2012 | DPSP are guidelines, not rights — but they’re essential to understand constitutional morality |
| State of Karnataka v. R. C. Kunta | 2017 | SC held that DPSP can inform statutory interpretation |
| Common Cause IV | 2019 | Right to die with dignity — DPSP Articles 41, 47 applied |
Fundamental Duties (Part IV-A, Article 51A)
42nd Amendment (1976) added Part IV-A with 10 Fundamental Duties:
- To abide by Constitution and respect national flag, national anthem
- To cherish and follow the noble ideals of freedom struggle
- To protect sovereignty, unity, integrity of India
- To defend the country (provide national service when required)
- To promote harmony and brotherhood — renounce practices derogatory to women
- To protect natural environment — conserve wildlife
- To develop scientific temper, humanism
- To safeguard public property, abjure violence
- To strive for excellence — all-round development
- To provide opportunities to children for education (86th Amendment)
Key Cases on Duties:
- Raghunandan Swarup v. Union of India (2015): SC refused to enforce Fundamental Duties — said “shall be enforced by law” (not by court)
- Common Cause IV: Right to die with dignity — DPSP Article 41 supports FR
Important for BPSC: Fundamental Duties are non-justiciable like DPSP — Article 51A says “shall be enforced by law” — Parliament can make law for enforcement.
DPSP Implementation: Schemes and Laws
| DPSP | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Art. 39(b) — Equal distribution | Land reform laws, ceilings |
| Art. 41 — Right to work | MGNREGA (2005) |
| Art. 45 — Early childhood | Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Mid-day meals |
| Art. 43 — Living wage | Minimum Wages Act |
| Art. 44 — Uniform Civil Code | Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita (2023) — UCC not yet passed |
| Art. 46 — SC/ST welfare | SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act |
Critical Thinking Points for BPSC
Q. Why are DPSP non-justiciable? A. Because Indian courts cannot handle policy questions. DPSP require resources, planning — judiciary cannot order the state to build schools (no enforcement mechanism). Also, India was poor — couldn’t guarantee all DPSP immediately.
Q. Can DPSP override FR? A. No — FR prevails (Minerva Mills, 1980). FR is the minimum threshold; DPSP is the aspiration.
Q. How are DPSP relevant today? A. In judicial interpretation — courts use DPSP to expand FR (e.g., right to privacy includes dignity as in DPSP Article 38).
Practice Questions (BPSC Pattern)
-
Directive Principles of State Policy have been borrowed from the constitution of:
- (a) USA
- (b) Ireland
- (c) Canada
- (d) UK
-
Which article makes DPSP non-justiciable?
- (a) Article 36
- (b) Article 37
- (c) Article 38
- (d) Article 39
-
The golden triangle of the Constitution refers to:
- (a) Articles 14, 19, 21
- (b) Articles 32, 37, 51A
- (c) Articles 36, 37, 38
- (d) Articles 39, 40, 41
-
Which case held that DPSP cannot override FR?
- (a) Kesavananda Bharati
- (b) Minerva Mills
- (c) Golak Nath
- (d) Maneka Gandhi
Answers: 1(b), 2(b), 3(a), 4(b)
Content adapted based on your selected roadmap duration. Switch tiers using the selector above.