Completion & Final Review
🟢 Lite — Quick Review (1h–1d)
Completion & Final Review — Key Facts
- ISA 560 — Subsequent Events (between balance sheet date and auditor’s report date)
- ISA 570 — Going Concern (assessing ability to continue as going concern)
- ISA 580 — Written Representations (management representations as audit evidence)
- ISA 520 — Analytical Procedures (evaluation of financial information through analysis)
- Subsequent Events Types:
- Type 1: Adjusting events (affect FS — must adjust)
- Type 2: Non-adjusting events (don’t affect FS — must disclose)
- Going Concern: Entity may be unable to continue operations for foreseeable future (12 months from approval date)
- Written Representations: Formal written statements from management — NOT a substitute for sufficient appropriate evidence
⚡ Exam Tip: Going concern is HOT exam topic. Always check for: consecutive losses, loan covenant breaches, negative working capital, dependence on single customer/supplier, litigation.
🟡 Standard — Regular Study (2d–2mo)
Completion & Final Review — Detailed Content
ISA 560 — Subsequent Events:
Definition: Events occurring between the balance sheet date and the date of the auditor’s report.
Timeline:
Balance Sheet Date ─────────────────── Auditor's Report Date
↓ ↓
Year-end Report issued to shareholders
|←────── Subsequent Period ──────────────→|
Two Types:
Type 1 — Adjusting Events: Events that provide additional evidence of conditions existing at balance sheet date.
Examples:
- Insolvency of a receivable (customer fails after year-end)
- Sale of inventory at lower than cost (NRV evidence)
- Resolution of a provision (confirms estimate)
- Discovery of fraud or error
Required Action: Adjust the financial statements
Type 2 — Non-Adjusting Events: Events that arise from conditions after balance sheet date (not existing at year-end).
Examples:
- Mergers and acquisitions after year-end
- Asset destruction by fire (occurred after year-end)
- Changes in foreign exchange rates
- Decline in market value of investments after year-end
Required Action: Disclose in notes if material (non-adjusting but material = note disclosure with quantified impact)
Auditor’s Procedures for Subsequent Events:
- Inquire with management about events after balance sheet date
- Review board/management meeting minutes post year-end
- Review latest interim financial statements
- Review accounting records (journal entries, reconciliations)
- Consider need for events occurring after report date (reissue vs dual dating)
ISA 570 — Going Concern:
Key Definitions:
- Going Concern Assumption: Entity will continue operations for foreseeable future (minimum 12 months from approval date)
- Material Uncertainty: Doubt about entity’s ability to continue — requires EOM (Emphasis of Matter) paragraph
- Substantial Doubt: Significant doubt requiring going concern opinion modifications
Going Concern Assessment Process:
Step 1: Perform risk assessment — identify going concern indicators
Step 2: Evaluate management's assessment (forecast, assumptions)
Step 3: Assess adequacy of management's plans
Step 4: Consider mitigating factors (bank support, asset disposals)
Step 5: Consider need for disclosure/EOM paragraph
Step 6: Conclude on going concern assumption
Going Concern Indicators (ISA 570):
- Financial: Net liability position, adverse key ratios, negative cash flows, loan covenant breaches, inability to pay creditors
- Operational: Loss of key management, loss of major customer/supplier, labor disputes, legal proceedings
- Other: Natural disasters, regulatory action, going concern qualification in prior year
⚡ Exam Tip: Management override (ISA 240) is relevant here — management may manipulate forecasts to present overly optimistic going concern assessments.
ISA 580 — Written Representations:
Purpose: Provide evidence about specific matters that cannot be verified with third parties (e.g., management intentions, completeness of disclosures).
Key Points:
- Written representations ARE audit evidence (but not sufficient on their own)
- Cannot substitute for other sufficient appropriate evidence
- Should be obtained on the auditor’s report date
- If management refuses to provide → qualified/disclaimer of opinion
Contents of Management Representation Letter:
- Financial statements are properly prepared
- All relevant information disclosed
- All contingencies disclosed
- No material misstatements
- Management’s assessment of going concern is valid
- Completeness of transactions and records
- Availability of all books and records
🔴 Extended — Deep Study (3mo+)
Comprehensive Completion & Final Review Notes
ISA 520 — Analytical Procedures at Completion:
Analytical procedures MUST be performed in the completion stage to:
- Assist in forming overall conclusion on financial statements
- Compare financial performance with prior periods
- Compare with industry benchmarks
- Investigate significant fluctuations and relationships
Types of Analytical Procedures:
| Type | Method | Reliability |
|---|---|---|
| Trend analysis | Compare line items over time | Medium |
| Ratio analysis | Calculate and compare key ratios | Depends on data quality |
| Reasonableness testing | Compare actual vs expected | High if reliable data |
| Reasonableness of totals | Reconcile control accounts | Medium |
Key Ratios to Calculate at Completion:
- Gross profit margin (compare to prior year and industry)
- Net profit margin
- Current ratio (liquidity)
- Quick ratio (acid test)
- Debtor collection period
- Creditor payment period
- Inventory turnover
- Return on capital employed (ROCE)
Overall Review — Final Sign-Off Checklist:
□ Obtain representation letter from management
□ Perform analytical procedures on FS
□ Review subsequent events (ISA 560)
□ Evaluate going concern (ISA 570)
□ Evaluate adequacy of disclosures
□ Obtain updated lawyer's letter (contingencies)
□ Review for subsequent discovered facts (ISA 560 post-report)
□ Confirm no management bias in estimates
□ Evaluate sufficiency and appropriateness of evidence
□ Review working papers for completeness
□ Discuss with TCWG (those charged with governance)
□ Form audit opinion and draft report
□ Partner review and sign-off
ISA 560 — Subsequent Discovered Facts (Post-Report):
If auditor discovers facts after report date:
- Facts existing at report date → Consider whether FS need amendment; if yes, communicate to TCWG; if management refuses → take legal advice
- Facts after report date → No action required (unless they affect matters at balance sheet date)
Going Concern — Modified Opinion Scenarios:
| Situation | Opinion Type |
|---|---|
| Material uncertainty, adequately disclosed | Unmodified + EOM paragraph |
| Material uncertainty, inadequately disclosed | Qualified (Limitation) or Adverse |
| Going concern basis inappropriate | Qualified or Adverse |
| Significant doubt but not material | Unmodified + possibly EOM |
Written Representations — Specific Representations:
The letter should include representations on:
- Management’s responsibility for FS
- Fair presentation of FS
- Completeness of information provided
- Provision of all minutes of meetings
- Transactions properly recorded and disclosed
- Compliance with applicable laws and regulations
- Identification of related parties and transactions
- No undisclosed contingent liabilities
- No events after balance sheet date requiring adjustment/disclosure
- Management’s assessment of going concern is appropriate
- Provision for inventory NRV is adequate
- Provision for bad debts is adequate
Common Exam Mistakes:
| Mistake | Correction |
|---|---|
| ”Subsequent receipts = no issue with receivables” | Subsequent receipts prove EXISTENCE but not VALUATION (customer might have paid AFTER year-end but already be insolvent) |
| “Going concern = unqualified always” | If material uncertainty exists and not adequately disclosed → modified opinion |
| ”Management letter = substitute for evidence” | Written representations are evidence, NOT a substitute for other evidence |
| ”All post-year-end events = adjusting” | Only adjust if they confirm conditions EXISTING at balance sheet date |
⚡ High-Yield Going Concern Formula:
Working Capital = Current Assets − Current Liabilities
If Current Assets < Current Liabilities → Net Current Liability Position
→ Potential Going Concern Risk
Indicators requiring immediate attention:
□ Negative working capital
□ Overdraft exceeding authorized limit
□ Loan covenants breached (or about to be)
□ Debts maturing within 12 months without refinancing
□ Reliance on single customer (>50% revenue)
⚡ Audit Final Review — Key Questions to Ask:
- Have all material misstatements been corrected?
- Is the going concern assumption appropriate?
- Are subsequent events properly accounted for?
- Is the evidence sufficient and appropriate?
- Are disclosures complete and accurate?
- Does the FS present fairly in all material respects?
- Any unusual transactions requiring disclosure?
- Related party transactions properly disclosed?
Content adapted based on your selected roadmap duration. Switch tiers using the selector above.